Presented by

Stablecoins hold the promise of shaping the architecture for the next generation of payments and overcoming many of the inefficiencies of legacy systems. The race for adoption is heating up, with the United States leading through private-sector issuers and many nations accelerating their own regulatory frameworks. At stake is control over the payment layer of the future financial system.

Yet China, the world’s second largest economy and often portrayed as America’s main challenger in the global order, is still playing a very different game. While much of the world races ahead with stablecoin adoption, stablecoins remain tightly restricted in the mainland. While China is exploring a potential yuan-backed stablecoin, the CCP has historically embraced its state-controlled CBDC, the e-CNY.

Retail CBDCs offer governments unparalleled oversight of the money supply and citizen behavior. But this same control makes them far less attractive to global capital, which values freedom of movement and protection against arbitrary seizure. The e-CNY, for example, is designed with embedded programmability that allows authorities to set expiration dates, restrict certain uses, or freeze balances. Such features may help manage speculation and financial stability, but they also wall the system off from DeFi protocols and the innovation of the global crypto economy.

By contrast, programmable stablecoins are proving more adaptable in a globalized world. Governments can still compel issuers like Circle to freeze and seize funds tied to illicit activity, while onchain forensics, digital identity, and KYC/AML checks make it increasingly easy to tie wallets to real-world actors. These tools offer powerful enforcement capabilities without the political stigma of a CBDC.

This model also strengthens national currencies, most notably the U.S. dollar. In many unstable economies, citizens increasingly prefer to hold USD-backed stablecoins like USDC and USDT rather than their local money, reinforcing dollar dominance in a bottom-up fashion. Unlike physical cash or offshore bank accounts, stablecoins spread globally with cash-like ease while still allowing the U.S. government to exert direct control through regulated issuers. This marks a new level of monetary power that projects American influence into wallets worldwide and raises difficult questions: how far does this jurisdiction extend, and what does it mean when world citizens depend on a system ultimately answerable to Washington?

As U.S. dollar stablecoins expand globally through private issuers, China’s limited and tightly controlled pilots risk missing the network effects that drive adoption. Whether this cautious approach proves beneficial remains uncertain, but for now it looks it could leave China struggling to catch up with faster-moving players in global stablecoin adoption.